By -
When assessing the value of a Family Law case don't forget the Civil Discovery Act. Discovery tools can be very helpful in narrowing the issues. In handling dozens of complex financial matters, I have heavily utilized Special Interrogatories coupled with Demands for Production of Documents.

Using the proper discovery tools can help narrow the issues and settle cases.

Simply put, Special Interrogatories are questions asked of the other side in written form. The questions should be straightforward and concise. The law governing Special Interrogatories (in CA) is outlined in the Code of Civil Procedure. 
Below, I have tried to describe some helpful tips re the law and the use of Special Interrogatories in the Family Law realm. First, Special Interrogatories, are normally limited to 35 inquiries. This limit may be increased by way of a declaration of necessity. Said declaration will generally need to describe the need for the additional demands and its appropriateness of allowing the proponent to exceed 35 inquiries i.e. cheaper than taking a deposition. Second, the demand for Special Interrogatories may be useful when trying to assess the legitimacy of a FC Section 2640 claim for reimbursement. For instance, your interrogatory may request that the opposing party identify all documents supporting his or her claim for reimbursement. Once this is done you may then request production of the identified documents. Said demand may be made with a Notice for Production of Documents. I usually propound the interrogatories and the demand together. This saves time and money. Third, forcing an individual to identify all items in this manner usually prevents "gotcha litigation" or sand bagging by other side. Lastly, when all the cards are on the table, I normally see good faith settlement talks commencing from both sides. Said settlement would either recognize the reimbursements (assuming their proven up) or disregard them. This method of discovery usually limits the he said she said and helps get to the finish line.

Using discovery responses in Court!

Discovery responses may be used in Court. In general, said responses, if supported by a signed verification, overcome any and all objections regarding hearsay.

Good Luck & remember to "Act Accordingly"!!!

Sincerely,

Patrick Baghdaserians, Esq. & CFLS




 

 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

California Statutory Criteria For Determination of Custody Disputes

By -
Family Code § 3022 provides the court with authority to make an order for the custody of a minor child that seems necessary and proper during the pendency of a proceeding or at any time thereafter.    California family law courts use Family Code § 3040 to establish the order of preference in granting custody in divorce actions.  The first section of this code section provides that “Custody should be granted in the following order of preference according to the best interest of the child as provided in Sections 3011 and 3020.” Parties involved in a custody dispute would be wise to review Family Code §§ 3011 and 3020.  Since these two sections outline the criteria that California judges use to determine custody disputes, parties to such actions should address these factors in their declarations when providing testimony and argument.  Successful litigants spend time addressing facts that directly address these factors.  Spending too much time on fact...
Read more
By -
Image
BEYOND GUIDELINE CHILD SUPPORT           For nearly 100 years, California courts have consistently maintained and fostered the  principle  that the duty of a parent does not end by providing mere necessities of life if he is able to afford more.  Bailey vs. Superior Court (1932) 215 Cal.548, 555. On countless occasions courts have explicitly established that the child has a  right “to be supported in a  style and condition that is consonant with the  position in society of its parents .”  Kyne vs. Kyne (1945) 70 Cal.App. 2d 80, 83.          The California  Family Code  provides specific code provisions in regards the   establishment of child support orders in the state by trial courts.  Said code sections demonstrate a very clear intent and objective of the legislature to ensure fair and  appropriate child support orders are rendered for children with parents from...
Read more
By -
Image
         Paying too much in Spousal Support? Call us! Modification of a spousal support order is a matter for the exercise of the court’s discretion, based upon a showing of a change of circumstances since the last spousal support order.  In re Marriage of Meegan  (1992) 11 Cal. App. 4 th 156, 161;   In re Marriage of Stephenson (1995) 39 Cal. App. 4 th 71, 76-77. “In determining whether a change of circumstances has occurred, the trial court is required to reconsider the same standards and criteria set forth in . . . now Family Code section 4320 it considered in making the initial long-term order at the time of judgement and any subsequent modification order.”   Marriage of Stephenson (1995) 39 Cal. App. 4 th 71, 77. In other words, in considering a spousal support modification request - … given the predicate of a change of circumstances – the trial court looks at the various factors bearing on spousa...
Read more