By -













FORMAL DISCOVERY IS LIBERALLY CONSTRUED IN CALIFORNIA!

When enforcing the right to full and complete discovery, Family Law courts should be liberal in its exercise.  Code Civ. Proc. § 2017.010 provides as follows: 
Unless otherwise limited by order of the court in accordance with this title, any party may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action or to the determination of any motion made in that action, if the matter either is itself admissible in evidence or appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Discovery may relate to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or of any other party to the action. Discovery may be obtained of the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter, as well as of the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any document, electronically stored information, tangible thing, or land or other property. [Emphasis Added.]
Further, Fairfield v. Superior Court(1966) 246 Cal.App.2d 113, 119-120, quoting 
Caryl Richards, Inc. v. Superior Court (1961) 188 Cal.App.2d 300, 303-304 stated that:
One of the principle purposes of the Discovery Act is to enable a party to obtain evidence in the control of his adversaryin order to further the efficient, economical disposition of cases according to right and justice on the merits. ….The statute is to be liberally interpreted so that it may accomplish its purpose. [Emphasis Added.]

Sincerely, 

 Patrick Baghdaserians, CFLS
Family Law Attorney and Expert Located in Pasadena, CA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

California Statutory Criteria For Determination of Custody Disputes

By -
Family Code § 3022 provides the court with authority to make an order for the custody of a minor child that seems necessary and proper during the pendency of a proceeding or at any time thereafter.    California family law courts use Family Code § 3040 to establish the order of preference in granting custody in divorce actions.  The first section of this code section provides that “Custody should be granted in the following order of preference according to the best interest of the child as provided in Sections 3011 and 3020.” Parties involved in a custody dispute would be wise to review Family Code §§ 3011 and 3020.  Since these two sections outline the criteria that California judges use to determine custody disputes, parties to such actions should address these factors in their declarations when providing testimony and argument.  Successful litigants spend time addressing facts that directly address these factors.  Spending too much time on fact...
Read more
By -
Image
BEYOND GUIDELINE CHILD SUPPORT           For nearly 100 years, California courts have consistently maintained and fostered the  principle  that the duty of a parent does not end by providing mere necessities of life if he is able to afford more.  Bailey vs. Superior Court (1932) 215 Cal.548, 555. On countless occasions courts have explicitly established that the child has a  right “to be supported in a  style and condition that is consonant with the  position in society of its parents .”  Kyne vs. Kyne (1945) 70 Cal.App. 2d 80, 83.          The California  Family Code  provides specific code provisions in regards the   establishment of child support orders in the state by trial courts.  Said code sections demonstrate a very clear intent and objective of the legislature to ensure fair and  appropriate child support orders are rendered for children with parents from...
Read more
By -
Image
         Paying too much in Spousal Support? Call us! Modification of a spousal support order is a matter for the exercise of the court’s discretion, based upon a showing of a change of circumstances since the last spousal support order.  In re Marriage of Meegan  (1992) 11 Cal. App. 4 th 156, 161;   In re Marriage of Stephenson (1995) 39 Cal. App. 4 th 71, 76-77. “In determining whether a change of circumstances has occurred, the trial court is required to reconsider the same standards and criteria set forth in . . . now Family Code section 4320 it considered in making the initial long-term order at the time of judgement and any subsequent modification order.”   Marriage of Stephenson (1995) 39 Cal. App. 4 th 71, 77. In other words, in considering a spousal support modification request - … given the predicate of a change of circumstances – the trial court looks at the various factors bearing on spousa...
Read more