By -

 


                          FIVE COMMON QUESTIONS REGARDING MEDIATION


Who mediates? 
  • I usually recommend and utilize the services of a retired Judge or a Certified Family Law Specialist.  An experienced mediator can provide insight to a difficult client and help predict a possible outcome.
How much does it cost? 
  • Hiring a mediator is definitely not cheap. It can range from $350- $500 per hour.  These individuals usually require a 4 to 5 hour retainer deposit.  Trust me, in the long run this is NOTHING.  Remember my example from the above paragraph?  Yes, the hearing that's been continued for 2 years.  My client has spent nearly $15,000.00 associated with my preparation and multiple appearances.
What are the practical benefits?   
  • You can settle your entire case in a single sit down.  This will not only save you money but an endless barrage of court appearances.
  • You are protected by various statutory provisions regarding confidentiality.  What you say in mediation STAYS in mediation. 
  • You can cut through a lot of procedural and evidentiary restrictions.  The mediator can look through hearsay documents and provide his opinion regarding its impact with the case at hand.
  • Save the embarrassment.  Mediation is private and confidential!  This will ensure that none of your dirty laundry is exposed.  Remember, divorce proceedings are public! 

How do we ensure the mediation is fruitful? 
  • Hire a lawyer that understands family law and the pitfalls associated with litigating in Court.  I usually recommend hiring a Certified Family Law Specialist.
  • Treat the mediation date as if it were your trial date.  Simply put, be prepared!
  • Exchange mediation briefs and tentative trial Exhibit/Witness lists at least one week prior to mediation.  This will help ensure that both sides are prepared for the mediation.  Nothing is worse than showing up for a session and the other side being ill equipped to talk turkey.
  • Try to split the mediator's fee.  This helps ensure that both parties have some skin the fight. 
  • Hire a seasoned litigator.  An experienced litigator will be privy to the pitfalls of our judicial system.  He or she should definitely understand the benefits of informal resolution.  In my opinion, litigators quite often make the best participants in a mediation.  They are usually fully prepared and flexible on potentially litigated issues.  The last thing you want is an attorney who has never litigated an issue try to settle that issue.
Can every case be settled by way of mediation?
  • Unfortunately, not every case can be settled in mediation.  Sometimes parties are the roadblocks, other times the issues themselves render judicial intervention mandatory.  However, even in those instances mediation can be useful.  Mediation can help identify and narrow the remaining issues for litigation. 


Sincerely,


Patrick Baghdaserians, CFLS

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

California Statutory Criteria For Determination of Custody Disputes

By -
Family Code § 3022 provides the court with authority to make an order for the custody of a minor child that seems necessary and proper during the pendency of a proceeding or at any time thereafter.    California family law courts use Family Code § 3040 to establish the order of preference in granting custody in divorce actions.  The first section of this code section provides that “Custody should be granted in the following order of preference according to the best interest of the child as provided in Sections 3011 and 3020.” Parties involved in a custody dispute would be wise to review Family Code §§ 3011 and 3020.  Since these two sections outline the criteria that California judges use to determine custody disputes, parties to such actions should address these factors in their declarations when providing testimony and argument.  Successful litigants spend time addressing facts that directly address these factors.  Spending too much time on facts that do not relate to the a
Read more
By -
Family Law Judgments MAY be Set Aside Due to Fraud!             Civil litigants have the duty and obligation to be transparent with one another. Underhand conduct and trickery cannot and should not be tolerated by the trial court. This extends to the filing of documents with the court and representation made to adverse parties. These requirements are exponentially increased when dealing with a dissolution matter between spouses. The existence of both a confidential and fiduciary relationship requires that parties not only be transparent but also act in accordance with the utmost level of integrity and good faith dealing. When individuals seek to circumvent said requirements, the trials courts have the ability to right the wrong and set aside fraudulent and unjust orders.            Code of Civil Procedure , Section 473 provides in part as follows,  "The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a pa1iy or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, or
Read more
By -
Image
         Paying too much in Spousal Support? Call us! Modification of a spousal support order is a matter for the exercise of the court’s discretion, based upon a showing of a change of circumstances since the last spousal support order.  In re Marriage of Meegan  (1992) 11 Cal. App. 4 th 156, 161;   In re Marriage of Stephenson (1995) 39 Cal. App. 4 th 71, 76-77. “In determining whether a change of circumstances has occurred, the trial court is required to reconsider the same standards and criteria set forth in . . . now Family Code section 4320 it considered in making the initial long-term order at the time of judgement and any subsequent modification order.”   Marriage of Stephenson (1995) 39 Cal. App. 4 th 71, 77. In other words, in considering a spousal support modification request - … given the predicate of a change of circumstances – the trial court looks at the various factors bearing on spousal support under section 4320.   In re marriage of
Read more